Yes, he does.
:casty: On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 9:32 PM, Tim Fournet <[email protected]> wrote: > >From the Description: > """ > * During the occasional times the network is congested, this new > technology automatically ensures that all time-sensitive Internet traffic — > such as web pages, voice calls, streaming videos and gaming — moves without > delay. Less time-sensitive traffic, such as file uploads, peer-to-peer and > Usenet newsgroups, may be delayed momentarily...' Sounds like throttling to > me." > """ > *Sounds like QoS to me. I don't see a problem at all with giving downloads > a lower priority on the network than voice, streaming videos, and gaming. > They should have been doing this years ago when QoS prioritization became > common on most LANs and WANs. > > Do you really want your VoIP applications to stutter just so that your > neighbor can download the latest episode of Lost from thepiratebay 20 > seconds faster? > > > Will Hill wrote: > > http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/01/28/2153242 > > Because of the way YouTube stutters I thought they were already doing this. > They have also already been caught "managing" p2p and admit to blocking > ports, upload speed caps and other unpleasant breakage. Didn't they learn > from Comcast? > > _______________________________________________ > General mailing > [email protected]http://mail.brlug.net/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net > > > > _______________________________________________ > General mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.brlug.net/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net > >
_______________________________________________ General mailing list [email protected] http://mail.brlug.net/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net
