Yes. In the wise words of Eric Theodore Cartman its "having one's cake and eating it too".

--
Karthik Poobalasubramanian
Louisiana Board of Regents
[email protected]
[email protected]
225-910-6126





On Jan 29, 2009, at 1:15 PM, Tim Fournet wrote:

Wait, so you're wanting your internet provider to NOT differentiate
between VoIP and P2P mass download traffic, but you want the provider TO determine if traffic is generated by a botnet, and discriminate accordingly?




Will Hill wrote:
Shame on you for insults and false choices. I expect Cox to allocate bandwith for the job, not invest in filters that degrade service. Every dollar spent on racks of filters is an infrastructure dollar wasted. I also expect Cox to do their part in shutting down W32 botnets. I want Japanese network quality and pricing. That way, I get my video phone and my neighbor gets his movie.
What I'm getting instead looks more like dial up every day because of
problems inflicted by M$ and the MAFIAA. People who use and recommend
Windows don't have a right to complain about bandwith.


On Thursday 29 January 2009, Dustin Puryear wrote:

I think both of you have a valid point here.




_______________________________________________
General mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.brlug.net/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net



_______________________________________________
General mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.brlug.net/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net

Attachment: PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
General mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.brlug.net/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net

Reply via email to