Not very good excuse! Most of the US is plain nothingness.....
And the population is concentrated into relatively small areas.

Petri


worms wrote:
Japan is able to reach such high levels of broadband saturation
because of the extremely small land mass and high population density.

On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 10:40 PM, Will Hill <[email protected]> wrote:
  
What you say is more depressing than it is "gasoline."  You are confused about
the purpose of copyright and basic networking facts.  I hope that "most other
people" do not have the same kinds of missconceptions you do but I hesitate
to project one way or another.

Windows is a menace to networks everywhere.  W32 botnets are responsible for
the vast majority of the world's spam and are used to launch all sorts of
other malice.  This is because Windows has both systematic and accidental
flaws and each machine is essentially identical.  M$ and many third parties
have been working forever to "patch" these problems and Bill Gates promissed
everyone that Spam would be a thing of the past by now.  The cure has often
been worse than the dissease, to strip people of network freedom as if the
problem were users or the internet not Windows.  This has greatly reduced the
utility of networks for everyone directly and indirectly.   People who use
and recommend Windows are usually ignorant or deny this because it suits them
somehow.

US Copyright is a created right that violates people's natural right to free
press.  Article I, Section 8, Clause 8 gives congress the power to do this,
but only if it furthers the public knowledge and the state of the arts.  The
founding fathers of this country despised exclusive franchises as tools of
tyranny and control and copyrights were originally limited and sensible.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright_Clause

Many aspects of modern copyright law betray the public.  Attacks on network
freedom for the benefit of a few big publishers harms society in more
important ways than a missed sitcom.  One of the first  to object to
Comcast's throttling was a group that used P2P to distribute bible
translations.  Scientific research is greatly hampered by people's inability
to create digital libraries, and I can assure you that scientists all seek
the widest possible audience for their publications without the kinds of
rewards that MAFIAA pretend to offer people.  Laws that keep people from
sharing their own material with each other are UnAmerican and laws that
prevent private, non commercial copy are universally offensive and immoral.
Companies and business models which can't survive in freedom deserve to fail,
we will all be better off without them.

Finally, you seem blissfully unaware of the shameful place US networks hold in
the world.  The US is the most powerful country in the world but more than 20
other countries do better than we do and places like Japan do dramatically
better.  Instead of investing in a network that could provide everyone with
universal access to human knowledge, we have spent out time and money on
wiretaps that would make Erich Honecker blush, fighting P2P, which is one of
the most efficient ways to distribute popular content, and writing stupid
laws like this:

http://biology.plosjournals.org/perlserv/?request=get-document&doi=10.1371/journal.pbio.1000030&ct=1&SESSID=f246fced5098a13180e242e58f10e1db

Several people have pointed to Lafayette as an example of how things can be,
but it will take a lot more than fiber to make networks serve the public
instead of a few vested interests.  People like you need to be taught to
demand what's right for you or science, the state of the arts, freedom of
press and your privacy will be lost to the next version of cable TV.

Please help yourself to my pictures, classnotes code and other projects that I
offer.  Cox has yet to complain about my bandwith use because most people are
not that interested in my stuff.  They also seem to tolerate other "servers"
such as IM and P2P clients which are far more popular and consume almost as
much bandwith as the W32 botnet spam flood.

On Thursday 29 January 2009, Andrew Baudouin wrote:
    
Not to throw any more gasoline on the fire with this, but you posted
"People who use and recommend Microsoft don't deserve to complain about
bandwidth".

Will, you just seem to have much different thought processes than most
other people.  I frequently fail to understand them, because they seem
immature (e.g. I want unlimited bandwidth to download whatever I want
including copyrighted material, 0 ms latency for my apps, and I also want
Cox to give that to me for $10 a month while removing all botnets from
their network, All information should be free, because I say so, Windows
users are inferior as human beings, etc)

I would like to gently remind you that you are currently violating Cox's
TOS (line item 6) by hosting a web server on port 1024.
      

_______________________________________________
General mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.brlug.net/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net

    

_______________________________________________
General mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.brlug.net/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net

  

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
_______________________________________________
General mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.brlug.net/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net

Reply via email to