On Sat, 19 Oct 2002 04:07, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: > > If not, can they still use the name 'commons' ? ( like > > commons-logging, etc ). > > since it is compartmentalised under jakarta, mho is 'yes'.
The one problem (at least in java land) is that classes are usually namespaced in reverse DNS order. ie org.apache.commons.X which will clash with jakarta commons. Apache.com does not seem to do java development work so it may be the case where we can move to apache.commons.X for the Apache commons - thus sidestepping namespace issues. Not sure though. -- Cheers, Peter Donald -------------------------------------------------- Logic: The art of being wrong with confidence... --------------------------------------------------
