I TOTALLY think the list should be renamed to something that doesn't
collide with jakarta-commons. I just forgot what list I'd stated it
emphatically on ;-)
so +1 for renaming it anything else that doesn't collide. an easy way
to see if it collides is to do a find in cvsroot. (someone said it was
hard I disagree) with *name*. heck just use "locate" if its set up ;-)
On Mon, 2002-10-21 at 00:53, Michael A. Smith wrote:
> Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
> > Having a debate on this is STUPID. There are no merits less two:
>
> I understand the issues of reply-to munging vs. not munging the
> reply-tos, which is why I didn't bother replying to Justin's post -- I
> didn't want to start a debate. I just wanted my voice heard.
>
> But, again, the point of my original email (which seemed to spur the
> creation of this thread) was not to start a debate about it. My main
> point was to suggest another alternative name for "commons" ("share" or
> "shared") and to ask whether there was a list that was receiving the
> commit messages for the commons repository.
>
> I find it kind of amusing that my id got added in the STATUS file to
> those in favor of reply-to munging, yet my alternative suggestion for a
> name that doesn't conflict with jakarta-commons was ignored and not
> added to the file.
>
> Must have something to do with starting my email with a touchy topid.
> Very few probably read past the first paragraph. C'est la vie.
>
> regards,
> michael
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
--
http://www.superlinksoftware.com - software solutions for business
http://jakarta.apache.org/poi - Excel/Word/OLE 2 Compound Document in
Java
http://krysalis.sourceforge.net/centipede - the best build/project
structure
a guy/gal could have! - Make Ant simple on complex Projects!
The avalanche has already started. It is too late for the pebbles to
vote.
-Ambassador Kosh
