Greg Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 11:36:03PM -0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >... > > @@ -222,22 +227,28 @@ > > - Where should the CVS code be located? > > > > commons/serf (each component under top-level) > > + +1: fitz (Please don't mix interface and implementation > > + of commons!) > > -0.5: gstein > > Do you think this scales? What happens when we have a hundred components?
When we have 100 components we have a CVS directory with 100 directories in it? What's wrong with that? Am I missing something? > [ of course, the answer might be that if we hit that many under our purview, > then something is wrong -- a reorg would be needed to spin out components > into top-level projects and/or top-level aggregates ] Perhaps. I don't know what commons is going to look like in a year or two. My main beef is that our infrastructure doesn't have to mirror the face that we present to the public via the commons website--at least until we go with SourceCast. :) -Fitz
