Hi Ron,

Yes, it behaves exactly the same.  I've also tried using the explicit 
option "item-order" and adding a matching default collation to the 
prolog of the query.

What's interesting is that doing a cts:frequency() on the two "Pia, 
H.W." values gives different numbers when doing the frequency lookup as 
part of the same query (e.g. in a FLOWR).  However, when searching for 
the matching documents by string value in an XPath I only get one of the 
frequencies.  It is as if one of the values in the list is completey 
bogus.  I am confused :(

-Steve

On 06/06/2011 09:52, Ron Hitchens wrote:
>     Does it behave the same way with an explicit collation
> option on the call to cts:element-attribute-values that
> matches the one in the range index definition?
>
> http://developer.marklogic.com/pubs/4.2/apidocs/Lexicons.html#cts:element-attribute-values
>
> On Jun 6, 2011, at 9:29 AM, Steve Mallen wrote:
>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> I have another mystery for the lexicon experts :)
>>
>> I've been fetching values out of a string attribute range index in item
>> order and processing them a batch at a time. But I have noticed that
>> occasionally I get duplicate values out of the index. This is causing
>> conflicting updates (since I use the URI-encoded name as the basis for
>> document URIs and insert many documents per query).
>>
>> I would have expected the cts:element-attribute-values() to return a
>> list of unique string values - I don't really want to have to do
>> fn:distinct-values() over them, and wouldn't have thought this necessary.
>>
>> I have checked the exact character strings returned by the function and
>> they are identical - I checked this by doing a string-to-codepoints() on
>> the suspect values. Here is an example of what I'm calling and getting
>> back from the server:
>>
>> cts:element-attribute-values(xs:QName('lexi'),
>> xs:QName('formatted_name'), "Pia, H.", ("limit=50"))
>>
>> Pia, H. W.
>> Pia, Hans Werner
>> Piacente, V.
>> Piacente, Vincenzo
>> Piacenti, Marcello
>> Piacentini-Sorbi, Sylvia
>> Piacentini, A.
>> Piacentini, Dario
>> Piacentini, Giuseppe
>> Piacentini, I.
>> Piacentini, John C.
>> Piacentini, Leonardo
>> Piacentini, Lucia
>> Piacentini, M.
>> Piacentini, Mauro
>> Piacentini, Paola
>> Piacentino, Filippo
>> Piacentino, G.
>> Piacere, A
>> Piačková, Veronika
>> Piacquadio, A. M.
>> Piacquadio, Piera
>> Piaditis, George
>> Piaget, A.
>> Piaget, Gerald W.
>> Piaget, Jean
>> Piaggesi, A.
>> Piaggi, GianCarlo
>> Piaggi, Stefania
>> Piaggio, G.
>> Piaggio, Gilda
>> Piaggio, Maurizio
>> Piagnani, C.
>> Piagnani, Maria Claudia
>> Piagnerelli, M
>> Piagnerelli, M.
>> Piagnerelli, Michael
>> Piaia, F.
>> Piaia, Rosamari
>> Piálek, Jaroslav
>> Piall, E. M.
>> Pialot, Olivier
>> Pialoux, G.
>> Pialoux, Vincent
>> Pia, F.
>> Pia, H. W.
>> Pia, Hans Werner
>> Pia, Julius
>> Pia, M. G.
>> Pia, S.
>>
>> Notice that "Pia, H.W." is returned from the top of the list and also
>> near the bottom. Now this suggests to me that either:
>>
>> a) There is only one value in the index and the function call is
>> returning it twice in different locations.
>>
>> or
>>
>> b) There are actually two values in the index, but they are somehow
>> being normalised and returned as the same string value.
>>
>> I am using the "Root Collation" for the range index. Could that be the
>> issue? This seems like it may be a bug to me, but perhaps I'm doing
>> something silly.
>>
>> Many thanks for your thoughts,
>>
>> -Steve
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> General mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://developer.marklogic.com/mailman/listinfo/general
> ---
> Ron Hitchens {mailto:[email protected]}   Ronsoft Technologies
>       +44 7879 358 212 (voice)          http://www.ronsoft.com
>       +1 707 924 3878 (fax)              Bit Twiddling At Its Finest
> "No amount of belief establishes any fact." -Unknown
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> General mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://developer.marklogic.com/mailman/listinfo/general

_______________________________________________
General mailing list
[email protected]
http://developer.marklogic.com/mailman/listinfo/general

Reply via email to