Thanks Danny ! I got the positive answer to my query. Abhishek Srivastav Systems Engineer Tata Consultancy Services Cell:- +91-9883389968 Mailto: abhishek5...@tcs.com Website: http://www.tcs.com ____________________________________________ Experience certainty. IT Services Business Solutions Outsourcing ____________________________________________
From: Danny Sokolsky <danny.sokol...@marklogic.com> To: General MarkLogic Developer Discussion <general@developer.marklogic.com> Date: 06/29/2011 09:22 PM Subject: Re: [MarkLogic Dev General] xdmp:trace and xdmp:log Sent by: general-boun...@developer.marklogic.com Hi Abhishek, While the server does conceptually have to check the settings for the log level and trace events, it is able to do this very efficiently, so I would not worry about that from a performance standpoint; MarkLogic keeps a view of the configuration in memory and can access that information very quickly. Now if you are logging millions of entries, that can take some resources, as it does have to be written to the ErrorLog.txt file, but again, I think you would have to be logging a lot of messages to make an appreciable difference in a query. As far as a performance comparison, as with all things, I?d recommend you profile it. I would expect them to be about the same, and for their cost to be very small (again, unless you call them a lot of times). -Danny From: general-boun...@developer.marklogic.com [ mailto:general-boun...@developer.marklogic.com] On Behalf Of Abhishek53 S Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 2:41 AM To: General MarkLogic Developer Discussion Cc: neha_punj...@mcgraw-hill.com Subject: [MarkLogic Dev General] xdmp:trace and xdmp:log Hi Folks Now this question is more theoretical. xdmap:trace and xdmp:log both are used to log information into ErrorText.txt file. The point of confusion is related to the mechanism both API uses for logging. Say if I use multiple time xdmp:log and xdmp:trace in the query , For every time logging API is used in the same query Do i check for the server settings for the corresponding logging API. Trying to explain through example Query: xdmp:log(<some-info>)....xdmp:log(<some-info>).....xdmp:log(<some-info>)....xdmp:log(<some-info>)..xdmp:trace(<some-info>) (Query is using multiple times logging throug xdmp:log & xdmp:trace) For each time xdmp:log do it verify server settings for level (info,debug...) For each time xdmp:trace do it verify server settings for event ID (event id is active/present) What about performance comparison between both the APIs? Thanks in advance ! Abhishek Srivastav Systems Engineer Tata Consultancy Services Cell:- +91-9883389968 Mailto: abhishek5...@tcs.com Website: http://www.tcs.com ____________________________________________ Experience certainty. IT Services Business Solutions Outsourcing ____________________________________________ =====-----=====-----===== Notice: The information contained in this e-mail message and/or attachments to it may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, use, review, distribution, printing or copying of the information contained in this e-mail message and/or attachments to it are strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us by reply e-mail or telephone and immediately and permanently delete the message and any attachments. Thank you _______________________________________________ General mailing list General@developer.marklogic.com http://developer.marklogic.com/mailman/listinfo/general
_______________________________________________ General mailing list General@developer.marklogic.com http://developer.marklogic.com/mailman/listinfo/general
