Hi All, Just to add to my query, ML 4.2 is giving results correctly irrespective of the filter used being "filtered" or "unfiltered". But when i change my query from unfiltered to filtered it gives me the correct result. Please suggest.
Regards Amit On 22 August 2012 20:20, <general-requ...@developer.marklogic.com> wrote: > Send General mailing list submissions to > general@developer.marklogic.com > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://developer.marklogic.com/mailman/listinfo/general > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > general-requ...@developer.marklogic.com > > You can reach the person managing the list at > general-ow...@developer.marklogic.com > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of General digest..." > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Number of threads for ML app (Danny Sinang) > 2. Option to not hit cache (Danny Sinang) > 3. Re: Option to not hit cache (David Lee) > 4. ML 5 giving different result count than ML4.2 (amit gope) > 5. Re: Option to not hit cache (Wayne Feick) > 6. Re: Option to not hit cache (seme...@hotmail.com) > 7. Re: Number of threads for ML app (Michael Blakeley) > 8. Re: Option to not hit cache (Michael Blakeley) > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Danny Sinang <d.sin...@gmail.com> > To: general <General@developer.marklogic.com> > Cc: > Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 07:33:54 -0400 > Subject: [MarkLogic Dev General] Number of threads for ML app > Hi, > > Our ML server is hosted by a machine with 16 cores with hypterthreading so > it looks like it has 32 cores total. > > Our main ML app is configured to use 32 threads with a backlog of 256 > . Should we stick to this setting or can we bump up the number of threads > to handle more requests simultaneously ? > > My colleague thinks we should match the number of ML threads to the number > of threads accepted by the application servers call ML services. I, > however, think we can't and shouldn't go beyond 32 because that's the > actual number of cores our machine has. > > Would appreciate any advice on this matter. > > Regards, > Danny > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Danny Sinang <d.sin...@gmail.com> > To: general <General@developer.marklogic.com> > Cc: > Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 08:00:15 -0400 > Subject: [MarkLogic Dev General] Option to not hit cache > Hi, > > Is there an option in xquery, cts:search, or search:search telling ML not > to fetch results from the cache ? > > We need to test the performance of some queries and we want to see its > actual speed not coming from the cache. > > Regards, > Danny > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: David Lee <david....@marklogic.com> > To: MarkLogic Developer Discussion <general@developer.marklogic.com> > Cc: > Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 05:03:01 -0700 > Subject: Re: [MarkLogic Dev General] Option to not hit cache > > Good question.**** > > Dumb suggestion: reboot the server between each query ?**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > **** > > David Lee > Lead Engineer > MarkLogic Corporation > d...@marklogic.com > Phone: +1 812-482-5224**** > > Cell: +1 812-630-7622 > www.marklogic.com > > This e-mail and any accompanying attachments are confidential. The > information is intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is > addressed. Any review, disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of this > e-mail communication by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the > intended recipient, please notify us immediately by returning this message > to the sender and delete all copies. Thank you for your cooperation.**** > > ** ** > > *From:* general-boun...@developer.marklogic.com [mailto: > general-boun...@developer.marklogic.com] *On Behalf Of *Danny Sinang > *Sent:* Wednesday, August 22, 2012 8:00 AM > *To:* general > *Subject:* [MarkLogic Dev General] Option to not hit cache**** > > ** ** > > Hi,**** > > ** ** > > Is there an option in xquery, cts:search, or search:search telling ML not > to fetch results from the cache ?**** > > ** ** > > We need to test the performance of some queries and we want to see its > actual speed not coming from the cache.**** > > ** ** > > Regards,**** > > Danny**** > > ** ** > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: amit gope <amitgo...@gmail.com> > To: general@developer.marklogic.com > Cc: > Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 17:44:31 +0530 > Subject: [MarkLogic Dev General] ML 5 giving different result count than > ML4.2 > Hello All, > > I have a search query, and while running the query on Ml5.0 the result > count is almost the double than what it returns on ML4.2 . Can anyone > suggest what can be the cause of this behaviour? > > -- > Regards > Amit > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Wayne Feick <wayne.fe...@marklogic.com> > To: MarkLogic Developer Discussion <general@developer.marklogic.com> > Cc: general <General@developer.marklogic.com> > Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 05:59:51 -0700 > Subject: Re: [MarkLogic Dev General] Option to not hit cache > > No, there isn't. Your best bet would be to stop the server, clear OS caching > from memory (e.g. unmount and remount the filesystem), and then restart the > server again. > > Wayne > > Danny Sinang <d.sin...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > Is there an option in xquery, cts:search, or search:search telling ML > not to fetch results from the cache ? > > We need to test the performance of some queries and we want to see its > actual speed not coming from the cache. > > Regards, > Danny > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: "seme...@hotmail.com" <seme...@hotmail.com> > To: MarkLogic Developer Discussion <general@developer.marklogic.com> > Cc: MarkLogic Developer Discussion <general@developer.marklogic.com> > Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 08:21:50 -0600 > Subject: Re: [MarkLogic Dev General] Option to not hit cache > What about setting the amounts for expanded and compressed tree caches to > be really small? Would that work? > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Aug 22, 2012, at 7:01 AM, "Wayne Feick" <wayne.fe...@marklogic.com> > wrote: > > No, there isn't. Your best bet would be to stop the server, clear OS caching > from memory (e.g. unmount and remount the filesystem), and then restart the > server again. > > Wayne > > Danny Sinang <d.sin...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > Is there an option in xquery, cts:search, or search:search telling ML > not to fetch results from the cache ? > > We need to test the performance of some queries and we want to see its > actual speed not coming from the cache. > > Regards, > Danny > > _______________________________________________ > General mailing list > General@developer.marklogic.com > http://developer.marklogic.com/mailman/listinfo/general > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Michael Blakeley <m...@blakeley.com> > To: MarkLogic Developer Discussion <general@developer.marklogic.com> > Cc: > Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 07:43:10 -0700 > Subject: Re: [MarkLogic Dev General] Number of threads for ML app > Your workload should guide you to the correct number of threads. I would > start with 2x cores, because of network latency. > > You may also want to consider a load balancer and/or reverse-proxy in > front of MarkLogic. The benefits from operational flexibility should be > clear. But in the case where you need to handle large numbers of requests > from distant, high-latency clients, this gives you a cheap place to buffer > them up. If your clients are few and well-connected, this is less of an > issue. But the operational flexibility is still useful. > > -- Mike > > On 22 Aug 2012, at 04:33 , Danny Sinang wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Our ML server is hosted by a machine with 16 cores with hypterthreading > so it looks like it has 32 cores total. > > > > Our main ML app is configured to use 32 threads with a backlog of 256 . > Should we stick to this setting or can we bump up the number of threads to > handle more requests simultaneously ? > > > > My colleague thinks we should match the number of ML threads to the > number of threads accepted by the application servers call ML services. I, > however, think we can't and shouldn't go beyond 32 because that's the > actual number of cores our machine has. > > > > Would appreciate any advice on this matter. > > > > Regards, > > Danny > > _______________________________________________ > > General mailing list > > General@developer.marklogic.com > > http://developer.marklogic.com/mailman/listinfo/general > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Michael Blakeley <m...@blakeley.com> > To: MarkLogic Developer Discussion <general@developer.marklogic.com> > Cc: > Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 07:50:46 -0700 > Subject: Re: [MarkLogic Dev General] Option to not hit cache > List cache and expanded-tree cache have to be large enough for the queries > you are running or you'll just get CACHEFULL errors. You can set > compressed-tree to 1, but the OS will just cache more of that data for you. > > Clearing the OS cache won't clear disk-level and controller-level caches. > In my experience those will make a measurable difference. > > The best solution is to design the workload so that it represent the real > application workload. A representative workload will use the various > hardware and software caches to the same extent that the real application > does, so no tricks will be needed. This is why database workloads are > typically large: 3x memory is a good rule of thumb. At that point the > access pattern and concurrency level will dictate cache utilization. > > Of course designing a good workload is hard, so folks look for shortcuts. > But this shortcut ends in a ditch. > > -- Mike > > On 22 Aug 2012, at 07:21 , seme...@hotmail.com wrote: > > > What about setting the amounts for expanded and compressed tree caches > to be really small? Would that work? > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > > On Aug 22, 2012, at 7:01 AM, "Wayne Feick" <wayne.fe...@marklogic.com> > wrote: > > > >> No, there isn't. Your best bet would be to stop the server, clear OS > caching from memory (e.g. unmount and remount the filesystem), and then > restart the server again. > >> > >> Wayne > >> > >> Danny Sinang < > >> d.sin...@gmail.com > >> > wrote: > >> > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> Is there an option in xquery, cts:search, or search:search telling ML > not to fetch results from the cache ? > >> > >> We need to test the performance of some queries and we want to see its > actual speed not coming from the cache. > >> > >> Regards, > >> Danny > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> General mailing list > >> General@developer.marklogic.com > >> http://developer.marklogic.com/mailman/listinfo/general > > _______________________________________________ > > General mailing list > > General@developer.marklogic.com > > http://developer.marklogic.com/mailman/listinfo/general > > > > _______________________________________________ > General mailing list > General@developer.marklogic.com > http://developer.marklogic.com/mailman/listinfo/general > >
_______________________________________________ General mailing list General@developer.marklogic.com http://developer.marklogic.com/mailman/listinfo/general
