thanks. It does not appear as though qtwebsockets has prebuilt platform dlls yet. official or not.
----- Original Message ----- From: bill lam <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Cc: Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2014 10:42:35 AM Subject: Re: [Jgeneral] QT web sockets Sorry, I do not understand your question. Anyways QtWebsocket is _not_ part of official qt. Please see jwiki for links. Ср, 29 янв 2014, Pascal Jasmin писал(а): > I assume this can be done manually by replacing the .dll contents of the qt > folder, with newer distributions from official qt repositories? Is there a > qt version you are targetting? > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: bill lam <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Cc: > Sent: Friday, January 24, 2014 11:56:52 AM > Subject: Re: [Jgeneral] QT web sockets > > The demo scripts shoud be ok, but it needs an updated jqt binary. > Chris and Norman is busy in preparing the official j8/jqt release. > Hopefully it will debut soon. > > Пт, 24 янв 2014, Pascal Jasmin писал(а): > > A note on the demos, > > > > there may be a file missing as every action seems to result in 'ws' command > > not found error. I was unable to locate a relevant file to load. > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Ian Daniher <[email protected]> > > To: [email protected] > > Cc: > > Sent: Friday, January 24, 2014 11:33:10 AM > > Subject: Re: [Jgeneral] QT web sockets > > > > > What benefits and disadvantages does QT web sockets have over J's > > native/direct implementation? > > > > I don't think J has a native implementation of websockets - they're a > > stream-like transport layer built on top of HTTP requests. AFAICT J has web > > sockets, but not websockets. > > > > This is very exciting! Thanks BillLam - can't wait to try this out! > > > > -- > > Ian > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Pascal Jasmin > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > Looks like J8 is getting a QT web socket implementation > > > > > > http://www.jsoftware.com/jwiki/Guides/JqtWebsocket > > > > > > > > > The noticeable changes with the existing socket library is: > > > There is a built-in event handler. > > > Communication is done through the wd layer with strings instead of direct > > > commands. > > > > > > Sorry, if this is asked before you were ready to announce: > > > > > > What benefits and disadvantages does QT web sockets have over J's > > > native/direct implementation? > > > > > > (I assume a partial answer is compatibility with more platforms?) > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > > -- > regards, > ==================================================== > GPG key 1024D/4434BAB3 2008-08-24 > gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 4434BAB3 > gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --armor --export 4434BAB3 > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm -- regards, ==================================================== GPG key 1024D/4434BAB3 2008-08-24 gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 4434BAB3 gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --armor --export 4434BAB3 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
