We should do a better job of showing people how to search.

I doubt you are the only person who has been frustrated by this issue.

But keep in mind, also, that even if you are not asking your questions
of us, it's good to write some of them down for yourself. Also, it's
OK if you ask questions which have already been addressed - with
enough repetition we then think about those issues some more.

Being respectful and constructive is great, but this community has a
tendency to overdo that so much that we miss out on a lot of useful
interaction.

Thanks,

-- 
Raul


On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 9:15 AM, Jim Russell <[email protected]> wrote:
> Now that I've remembered how to do better searches at jsoftware.com, I can 
> see there have been several thoughtful discussions about, and attempts at 
> preparing glossaries, indexes, introductions, etc. Perhaps I should spend 
> more time learning from those before I offer opinions.
>
>> On Feb 11, 2014, at 11:35 PM, Ian Clark <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Check out CategoryTerms
>> ...there's a clear(?) link to it from the bottom of NuVoc
>>
>> It would be good to get early feedback on: is this the way to go?
>>
>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 6:45 AM, Björn Helgason <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> It is good to be able to search the docs.
>>>
>>> Have options what to search.
>>>
>>> Addons, utilities, helps, examples,
>>> demos.
>>>
>>> Search on or offline.
>>>
>>> Good to be able to have the option to include code in the search strings.
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to