We've actually several environments: J602 wd j802 wd j802 qt j802 jhs
(I'm ignoring J7xx). Meanwhile there's multiple ways of integrating things. Sometimes it's simpler to add underlying infrastructure other times it makes more sense to patch things together at a higher level. Sometimes people just add if statements (which make things difficult to figure out and test, later). How would you approach this? Thanks, -- Raul On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 8:57 AM, Don Guinn <[email protected]> wrote: > Help/Studio brings up Qt Demos and WD Demos. Yet both use wd. Separate sets > of demos implies that the Qt and wd interfaces are different. Early in the > development of the Qt interface it made sense to develop the demos using > the Qt interface separate from the older demos. But why not combine them > now? > > Combining them would require a little cleanup as there are duplicate names > like "controls" in both sets. And the Qt demos tend to show specific > examples of forms tools where wd demos tend to more demo applications. > Maybe grouping types of demos like labs are grouped into categories would > make sense as the list of demos is quite long. But they are not different. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
