I cannot speak for google. I arrived at the link because I "know" frame is related to verb.
Пт, 15 янв 2016, Brian Schott написал(а): > [was programming forum] > > Bill's comment below directed me to the link he supplied. > Then I elected to view other pages in the Dictionary that refer to "frame" > with a google search "site:jsoftware.com/help/dictionary frame" . The > search did produce one excellent link, but surprisingly does not produce > the one that Bill supplied. > > The google-supplied link is > http://www.jsoftware.com/help/dictionary/dicta.htm . > Does anyone have an explanation for this behavior? > > On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 11:48 PM, bill lam <[email protected]> wrote: > > > For J implemention, the only authority is the J dictionary since > > it defines the J language. You need not worry anything else. > > > > http://www.jsoftware.com/help/dictionary/dictb.htm > > > > Пт, 15 янв 2016, Matthew Baulch написал(а): > > > I assume the intended definition of 'frame', in relation to verb > > arguments, > > > is that given on > > > > > > http://code.jsoftware.com/wiki/Vocabulary/FramingFill > > > > > > I'm just trying to understand verb/argument combinations with empty > > > frame--the most common case, I suppose. > > > > > > From the wording "each argument is ... an array of [r-cells]. The frame > > ... > > > is the shape of this array of [r-cells]", it seems that a frame should > > > never be empty, but in fact have a minimum shape of '1'. Of course, this > > > ties into the wording of many other statements. In the case of dyadic > > > verbs, for instance, > > > > > > "frames must agree ... they must be identical or one must be a prefix of > > > the other" (stated in link above) > > > > > > as opposed to > > > > > > "frames must agree ... one must have shape 1 or be a prefix of the other" > > > (the way I see it, assuming equality implies prefix-of) > > > > > > Can anyone shed some light on this? Is there an important reason for this > > > convention that I'm missing, or is it of little consequence? > > > > > > I'm implementing (or trying to...) a subset of J for the JVM, and this is > > > one little detail that's bothering me. > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > Matt Baulch > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > > > > -- > > regards, > > ==================================================== > > GPG key 1024D/4434BAB3 2008-08-24 > > gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 4434BAB3 > > gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --armor --export 4434BAB3 > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > > > > > > -- > (B=) <-----my sig > Brian Schott > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm -- regards, ==================================================== GPG key 1024D/4434BAB3 2008-08-24 gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 4434BAB3 gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --armor --export 4434BAB3 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
