I too would like a clear statement of best practice for recovering from
this situation. Maybe as a flowchart.

Whenever I see the warning message (usually after hitting "Save changes")
my reflex action is to do what Bob recommends: scroll to the "editing area"
and copy/paste it for emergency recovery. But it's so rarely necessary.
Usually it works to simply hit the "Save Changes" button a second time. (If
I dare.)

On occasions when I've panicked (and thus forgotten how exactly I
responded) it's subsequently emerged that the server has actually
registered my changes and updated the page. But to verify this fact is not
a simple task. If someone could only tell me how best to do it – as a
reflex action – the "demon warning" would no longer be an issue for me.

Good task-support for the task of recovery might include
-- a button which reliably copies the editing area to the system
pasteboard, not disruptable by a sick server or connection,
-- a confirmation message fom the server that the last "Save Changes"
button-click did not (logically) alter the page contents.

Ian

On Wed, 11 May 2022 at 16:51, Henry Rich <[email protected]> wrote:

> I think it's simply a loss of your reservation after a timeout.
> Wikipedia does the same.
>
> When you start editing a page, you get rights to it for a short time
> (maybe 5 min?).  After that, it's up for grabs.  When you repeat your
> save, it goes through (parhaps after a check for conflict).
>
> Henry Rich
>
> On 5/11/2022 11:41 AM, 'robert therriault' via General wrote:
> > Before reloading the page, I would suggest copying your most recent
> edits if you can.
> >
> > Then if you lose the edits on reloading, you should be able go to the
> original page, edit and paste in your saved edits to continue on.
> >
> > I have seen this as well, although not very often and I put it down to
> an interruption to my internet that might not be noticed by me on my
> browser,
> > but was enough to disrupt the editing process within the wiki.
> >
> > Cheers, bob
> >
> >> On May 11, 2022, at 08:33, Raul Miller <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> I suspect that that message means that your browser has lost track of
> >> a cookie or failed to perform a secondary request.
> >>
> >> It does not seem to be a timeout. Or, if that message does represent a
> >> timeout, there are also other issues which can trigger the problem:
> >> Sometimes simply reloading the page has been sufficient to make the
> >> message go away.
> >>
> >> I hope this helps,
> >>
> >> --
> >> Raul
> >>
> >> On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 11:29 PM Arthur Anger <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>> Now and then, after many minutes of making editing changes to a Wiki
> page, a Save request is greeted by:
> >>>   Sorry! We could not process your edit due to a loss of session data.
> >>>
> >>>   You might have been logged out.  . . .
> >>>
> >>> Is this a timeout in the editor, and can it be lengthened?
> >>>
> >>> Is this instead a result of temporary loss of communication, which
> does occur occasionally, but doesn't often have a visual effect during an
> editing session?
> >>>
> >>> I have sometimes managed to copy the edited page and reinstate it
> later, but wonder if there is standard recovery procedure.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks.
> >>> --Art
> >>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
>
> --
> This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
> https://www.avg.com
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to