Yes...

The issue here isn't that your hardware has changed, but that the
cost/benefits of avx support had shifted too far to the "cost" side of
things.

Where performance is a concern, there's been considerable advancement,
and the "people time" spent supporting avx could instead be spent
supporting avx512.

Where portability is a concern, the base architecture still works.

Not completely ideal, but I hope this helps make sense of things.

--
Raul

On Sat, May 6, 2023 at 11:51 AM Gilles Kirouac <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hardware capabilities 2!:7
>
>     2!:7''
> avx
>     JVERSION
> Engine: j9.4.0-beta13/j64avx/windows
> Build: commercial/2023-02-23T01:20:46/clang-15-0-7/SLEEF=1
> Library: 9.4.16
> Qt IDE: 2.0.3s/6.2.4(6.2.4)
> Platform: Win 64
> Installer: J904 install
> InstallPath: c:/users/mouton/j904
> Contact: www.jsoftware.com
>
> ===========================================
>     2!:7''
>
>     JVERSION
> Engine: j9.4.2/j64/windows
> Build: commercial/2023-04-10T01:23:07/clang-15-0-7/SLEEF=1
> Library: 9.4.21
> Qt IDE: 2.0.3/6.2.4(6.2.4)
> Platform: Win 64
> Installer: j9.4 install
> InstallPath: c:/users/mouton/j9.4
> Contact: www.jsoftware.com
>     ''-:2!:7''
> 1
>
> ===========================================
>
>    My CPU grows older and loses hardware capabilities, like me!😉
>
>    According to Intel, my CPU (Xeon® E3-1240 v2) "had" avx.
>
> ~ Gilles
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to