+1 to all. --- Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: > > 1) state loud and clear that the direction is Gumpy and retire > > traditional gump, this will help creating itches to scratch > > +1 > > > 2) refactor our CVS module: > > > > gump-traditional > > gump > > gump-data > > hmm. Split between code and data seems sensible, but I don't really get > why we want gump-1.0 and gump-2.0 in seperate repos? > > > 3) stop calling it gumpy but rather start doing version numbering, so > > that would be Gump 2.0, when Gump 1.0 was traditional > > +1 > > > 4) add a cron job so that [EMAIL PROTECTED] becomes the official gump run. > > +1 > > -- > cheers, > > - Leo Simons > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > Weblog -- http://leosimons.com/ > IoC Component Glue -- http://jicarilla.org/ > Articles & Opinions -- http://articles.leosimons.com/ > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > "We started off trying to set up a small anarchist community, but > people wouldn't obey the rules." > -- Alan Bennett > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
===== Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
