ajack 2004/05/24 22:54:21 Modified: blog/Issues GumpStorm.txt Log: Take two... Revision Changes Path 1.2 +4 -20 gump/blog/Issues/GumpStorm.txt Index: GumpStorm.txt =================================================================== RCS file: /home/cvs/gump/blog/Issues/GumpStorm.txt,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- GumpStorm.txt 25 May 2004 05:35:24 -0000 1.1 +++ GumpStorm.txt 25 May 2004 05:54:21 -0000 1.2 @@ -17,27 +17,11 @@ See the License for the specific language governing permissions and limitations under the License. --> -<B>History Repeating Itself</B> -<P> -About 6-7 years ago I was managing a small website for my mother on a local ISP. -I had a ~/.foward in [EMAIL PROTECTED] as simple as "[EMAIL PROTECTED]". Everything was fine until -DNS guy at THEN_WORK_ADDRESS quit, and time went buy w/ unpaid Internic bills. Suddenly that -address was ripped from the Internet, no longer valid [within DNS cache]. -When a message was sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (from me, a CGI script), it was returned (to me) along with a bounce notification. Two problems from one. -Things degraded exponentially! It brought down the ISP (SendMail in a hard in spin), and I was accused of intentional mail bombing. -Not so, but tonight sure felt the same. :( -</P> -<P> -Today, I disconnected early (lightening putting my sad modem at risk) and I just re-joined. Uh oh ... way to much Gump mail! -</P> -<P>I'd attempted this:<BR/> +<P>A <A HREF="http://gump.apache.org">Gump</A> change was commit to attempt:<BR/> <A HREF="http://issues.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED]&msgNo=6870">Notification Mail Rework</A><BR/> -Which was intended simply to ensure that Gump was a little more communicative, a little more timely. I way over compensated... -</P> -<P> -Unfortunately, the Ant bootstrap (old faithful, ultra reliable, solid base) failed sending 456 projects into a state that -incorrectly generated an e-mail. Another bad coincidence, another storm. History repeating itself. +Which was intended simply to ensure that Gump was a little more communicative, a little more timely. It way over compensated... </P> <P> -<B>Sorry folks...</B> +Unfortunately, the Ant bootstrap failed sending 456 projects into a state that +incorrectly generated an e-mail. Apologies for the noise... </P>
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]