> On Thu, 3 Jun 2004, Adam R. B. Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > 1) I've removed the id="" here (and will cleanup what fallout I can) > > 'cos Gump defaults id equal to jar basename, > > This is not entirely correct - and we either kill all "traditional > Gumps" now or get into a maintainence nightmare if you want to rely on > this.
Oops. Yeah, I've heard of that Gump. Darn, that is what I get for cutting down on caffeine. > "Traditional" and "Python" Gump behave differently in absence of an id > attribute - for the short term you may want to stick with explicit > ids. Agreed. regards, Adam --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
