> Do folks mind if we mandate Python 2.3 for Gump? Is this something we need a vote on? Something to grab folks attention, before I break things on them? [I'm guessing a VOTE is a lousy way to provoke participation, I'm guessing most folks (who read this request) are (like myself) not Python experts, so aren't responding. I still need to determine how to move on though.]
[Lack of answers to questions like this is why I worry about the traffic volume. I think there is too much volume for most of our community to monitor at a level they can process/participate (given that Gump is a sideline). Alternative ideas on how to solve that appreciated...] Personally, I don't have the expertise to judge if Python 2.3 has taken over from 2.2, however there are a lot of nice things in 2.3 (e.g. introduction of Boolean True/False keywords) and I'd really like to make the switch. That said, if anybody has a problem with it, and/or Python 2.3's coverage of OSs, I can wait. BTW: I see Python 2.3.4 is finalized http://python.org/2.3.4/, and has RPMs http://python.org/2.3.4/rpms.html. Most stable is marked as 2.3.3. (http://python.org/doc/faq/general.html#how-stable-is-python). As such, I assume some 2.3 is out there for most environments, but I don't know that. [FWIIW: Python 2.4 is in the works. ] regards, Adam --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
