Sebastian, Any follow-up? I'd like to find a way to ensure/clarify that you aren't a -1.
regards Adam ----- Original Message ----- From: "Adam R. B. Jack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Gump code and data" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2004 5:39 PM Subject: Re: [VOTE] retire java gump > > -0 (if that's allowed) > > > > But -1 if the proposal is to stop non-Python Gumps at present. > > I don't think anybody is intending the stop them, and I proposed a way to > let them continue to function (as we move Python out, into SVN, etc.) > > > > I'd suggest tagging CVS and making it clear that java gump may deviate > > > from documentation, etc but permit changes to the code. My main concern > > > > +1 > > Sadly the metadata is shared, and quite soon the <maven entries (supported > by Python, not by Java) will destroy the value of the Java ones. It is > already happening, this jsut makes it official. > > > As far as I can see, the Python Gumps are currently in the minority, so it > > makes sense to allow the Java Gumps to continue. > > I'd love to know if that is true, or not. > > > The more, the merrier, as there's then more chance that the inevitable > > installation differences will help find subtle build problems. > > I thought that, but with one metadata base it is getting unmanageable. We > could fork the metadata (I think I proposed that). > > > Also, none of the Python Gumps seem to make any generated jars available, > > even if they are redistributable. > > They still create them (if redistributable) they just don't publish them. I > am working on that very thing. I'd 'guarantee it' if that would grant this > your +1. > > regards > > Adam > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
