> Go for it. > > SVN rulez and it's very well integrated with IDEs now and many apache > projects are moving. >
I read this to mean you'd like to see Gump migrated to SVN. I could read your respones as saying, do my 'CVS branch' step first, since it is a move in the general directon, but I am guessing I'm stretching your intentions. Could you re-read and see that I meant, do a long lived CVS branch for Traditional, whilst I clean-up CVS HEAD to be pure Python, prior to a future SVN move. > And, besides, there is not that thousands of people updating their > descriptors anyway ;-) Yeah, but concensus was -- if SVN was a barrier for anybody (and we know it is becoming less and less w/ more projects in SVN) we ought keep metadata in CVS for a while longer. > Actually, i think that a better refactoring of the repository could help > people getting up to speed too, because the tree is currently a mess. That I do believe! [I also hate having to download a big fat Java xerces that I never use any more.] regards, Adam --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
