Understanding that, I agree. I don't know how the wsdl4j jar got into the repository originally, but if it is wrong then it should be fixed.
Sorry for the confusion. Cheers, Brett On Tue, 07 Dec 2004 08:59:15 +0100, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 7 Dec 2004, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > There are probably 3 solutions: > > 1) change the gump IDs to match (project axis, id axis-wsdl4j?) > > 2) map the gump ID with an additional file as Stefan mentioned earlier > > 3) add the ability to map to a different gump ID in the project.xml > > dependencies element and have it come out in the gump descriptor. > > > > I'm going to do (3) eventually, with (1) an additional long term > > solution and (2) the workaround we've been using. > > I'd agree with you that (1) should be the best approach, if wsdl4j > actually was an artifact of Axis. Since it gets created by a > totally different project and merely gets redistributed by Axis, I > think it is simply wrong to depend on axis:axis-wsdl4j in any Maven > build at all. > > Like I said, I'll start a new thread. > > > > Stefan > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
