On Tue, 14 Dec 2004, Ceki Gülc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The fact that a small typo affects 200 projects should tell you that
> something is wrong with Gump's current approach.
Absolutely agreed. We know we could do better, we just haven't had
the time/skills to change it yet.
> For example, just alerting log4j-dev and having the 200 affected
> projects to use yesterday's version of log4j would have been much
> better.
Which is what we intend to do one day.
> I am pleased to see that the problem on our side was corrected
> promptly.
Many thanks.
> I am much less so with nature of the social interaction that led to
> it.
I understand that and agree. I also understand Niclas, since he'd
certainly would love to see Gump build more stuff than it did and is
frustrated by glitches like this one. We all know that the typo could
have been caught before the commit, but we also know that things like
this have happened to all of us - probably more than once.
Cheers
Stefan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
