On 07-06-2005 21:16, "Stefan Bodewig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 07 Jun 2005, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, Adam R. B. Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> Ok, the what-is-becoming usual, i.e. circular dependency in the >>> metadata (dom4j/jaxen, I believe). >> >> "classic Gump" doesn't flag one. > > Bzzt wrong. Don't use a stalled source tree. > > Fixed now.
Stefan, Any chance you have time to get your classic gump installed over onto the solaris gump zone along with some instructions on how to run that check? We could have a cronjob to update from CVS, run the check, and send e-mail if it finds a problem. --- I could probably have a look at getting the gump walker+verifier modified to walk the gump2 code. The algorithm is pretty generic. Adam, could you give some pointers (filenames and linenumbers) where you think the insertion point for a cyclic dependency checker should be in gump3? Cheers! Leo --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
