On Thu, 2005-09-01 at 06:09 +0200, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On Tue, 30 Aug 2005, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > the original plan was to try to run two gump builds until the > > mavenised one was debugged. however, since the original run is no > > longer running very well, i suppose that there may be an argument > > for biting the bullet and moving now. > > I wouldn't expect the Maven run to work any better or worse than the > Ant one, so go ahead if you feel like it. > > The main problems we have with mavenized projects in Gump are > > (1) artifact-Id mismatches > > (2) projects depending on Maven plugins that are not (yet) installed > on the Gump machines. > > The second point somewhat bothers me since we have a few builds that > don't run just because a plugin that we wouldn't use for our builds is not > installed. But that's just me disagreeing with Maven's worldview 8-)
i agree that this is a little bit bothersome. i wonder whether it's not so much a problem with the worldview as a lacking feature. i don't know how to specify plugin dependencies for a maven build (so they could be automatically downloaded). without this feature, the build is not truly automatic or replicable. - robert
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
