Very reasonable. Adam
Sent from my iPad > On Jul 21, 2013, at 12:20 AM, Stefan Bodewig <bode...@apache.org> wrote: > > Hi > > after about a month we have three projects still interested in Gump > (Tomcat, POI, XMLGraphics), two saying they don't care too much (Xerces, > Xalan), one asking to get removed (Log4NET) and no other response. > > Basically this means Gump is useful for a small set of projects and they > still take something useful out of it. At the same time at least I'd > prefer to reduce the amount of time I spend on Gump. > > I've been thinking for quite some time about what to do with it. The > best I can come up with: > > * reduce the set of projects Gump builds to the three projects and the > transitive hull of its dependencies (basically Ant, JUnit, Xerces, > Xalan and a few Commons components) - maybe add a few project that > depend on those three if they don't require too many other > dependencies > > * Turn on nagging for the three projects and nobody else - reach out to > Davod Saff to see whether he'd like to keep receiving nags for JUnit > > * encourage the three projects to take on a more active role in Gump > > * tell infra to turn of our FreeBSD jail > > Does this sound reasonable? > > Stefan > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@gump.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@gump.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@gump.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@gump.apache.org
