+1 I ran the unit tests on the first version of the RC and all passed. MD5 and signature of this build match. -C
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 12:05 PM, Alan Gates <[email protected]> wrote: > I have rolled a new version of the tarball that has the version command > correct. I did not make any code changes, I just needed to run ant with the > correct properties set. So I have not made this a new release candidate. > So the candidate is at the same place as before, > http://people.apache.org/~gates/pig-0.6.0-candidate-1/ > > Please try it out and vote by Friday, February 26th. Thanks. > > Alan. > > On Feb 19, 2010, at 1:57 PM, Alan Gates wrote: > >> Alright, I'll fix that and reroll the release. >> >> Alan. >> >> On Feb 19, 2010, at 1:35 PM, Daniel Dai wrote: >> >>> "pig -version" should report 0.6.0 instead of 0.6.1. +1 otherwise. >>> >>> >>> -------------------------------------------------- >>> From: "Alan Gates" <[email protected]> >>> Sent: Friday, February 19, 2010 11:58 AM >>> To: <[email protected]> >>> Subject: Fwd: [VOTE] Release candidate for Pig 0.6.0 >>> >>>> PMC members, >>>> >>>> Please take a look and vote. Thanks. >>>> >>>> Alan. >>>> >>>> Begin forwarded message: >>>> >>>>> From: Alan Gates <[email protected]> >>>>> Date: February 16, 2010 11:22:52 AM PST >>>>> To: <[email protected]> >>>>> Subject: [VOTE] Release candidate for Pig 0.6.0 >>>>> Reply-To: [email protected] >>>>> >>>>> All, >>>>> >>>>> I have rolled a release candidate for Pig 0.6.0 and uploaded it to >>>>> http://people.apache.org/~gates/pig-0.6.0-candidate-1/ >>>>> A description of what is new and different in this release is included >>>>> in the release notes, which I have also uploaded to that directory. >>>>> Please >>>>> download the candidate, test it, and vote. >>>>> >>>>> Alan. >> > >
