On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 23:40, Eli Collins <e...@cloudera.com> wrote: > On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Tom White <t...@cloudera.com> wrote: >> One year ago (to the day!) Chris started a discussion about the >> release manager role >> (http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/201005.mbox/%3ch2q1267dd3b1005041331r7d8f696di370a279ff6058...@mail.gmail.com%3E). >> In light of today's disagreements, I think we should restart this >> discussion and incorporate these rules into the bylaws, since it >> formalizes our practices. >> >> I'm happy to drive this. We could start by discussing Chris' proposal >> (see clarifications in >> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/201005.mbox/%3ct2y1267dd3b1005051201h7116e4caud75673ac9d512...@mail.gmail.com%3E), >> then when we get consensus we can put the document on the website. >> (BTW does anyone know if the bylaws were checked into SVN anywhere? >> These belong together.) > > Sounds good to me. I like Chris' proposal, he was clear that "nothing > should be in (unreleased) 0.x that isn't also in trunk." so that may > needs to be revisited if we want to be consistent with today's vote. > > I don't think the bylaws were checked in, we should do that first. How > about checking them into the site repo so they get generated as part > of the docs? Eg this is how Pig does it: > http://pig.apache.org/bylaws.html
+1 makes sense. > > Thanks, > Eli >
