On Jun 17, 2011, at 12:36 AM, Ryan Rawson wrote: > HDFS-918 and HDFS-347 are absolutely critical for random read > performance. The smarter sites are already running HDFS-347 (I guess > they aren't running "Hadoop" then?), and soon they will be testing and > running HDFS-918 as well. Opening 1 socket for every read just isn't > really scalable.
Isn't "random read [on HDFS]" and "smarter sites" in the same breath an
oxymoron?
