+1 let's get rid of it for Pete's sake
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 03:16PM, Jakob Homan wrote: > This code has been broken for a long time and, while it's still in use > in some companies, they've had a long time to offer fixes. > > +1 on abandoning it. > > On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Eli Collins <e...@cloudera.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Allen Wittenauer <a...@apache.org> wrote: > >> > >> On Jul 20, 2011, at 2:55 PM, Eli Collins wrote: > >>> > >>> I don't think we should remove HDFSProxy because Hoop exists, I think > >>> we should remove it because it's broken and not being maintained. > >>> Broken and un-maintained code should be removed no? > >> > >> ═ ═ ═ ═That'd remove large chunks of hadoop. > >> > > > > We've made good progress removing broken / unmaintained code from > > Hadoop. ═Common no longer contains any contrib projects. And HDFS is > > down to two (hdfs proxy and fuse-dfs, and the latter is actually > > maintained, by myself and others). > > > > Thanks, > > Eli > >
