Hey Guys,

My super +1 for calling one 0.20.205 as 1.0.

1 point oh!

Cheers,
Chris

On Nov 14, 2011, at 2:11 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:

> Folks,
> 
> Apache Hadoop has come a long way since our humble beginnings. As a community 
> we've made significant progress, even in 2011 - we've had 3 releases off the 
> branch-0.20-security (0.20.205 being the latest) and we just released 0.23.0 
> last week, our first major release off trunk in a while.
> 
> With hadoop-0.20.205 we finally have an Apache release with both security and 
> HBase support, both critical for the growing ecosystem.
> 
> With that, I think it's time to call it as hadoop-1.0. The 1.0 moniker has 
> something we've wanted for a while and I think it's time for us to just ship 
> it. Linus did something similar with GNU/Linux 3.0. 
> 
> Yes, we could add more features or better it along many dimensions (ala 
> hadoop-0.23), but right now we have a pretty decent piece of software i.e.  
> the feature set in hadoop-0.20.205 is compelling and widely used. We could 
> call hadoop-0.23 (or 0.22) as 2.0 etc. I do think we, as a community, can 
> support compatibility in the hadoop-1.x series, which is the essential 
> ingredient. This isn't a brand new idea, Doug suggested this a long while 
> ago. 
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
> thanks,
> Arun
> 
> 
> 


++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Senior Computer Scientist
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov
WWW:   http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Reply via email to