+1 > Can we agree to 0.23 -> 2.0? That's consistent with the MR2 nomenclature.
Best Regards Ahmed On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Doug Cutting <cutt...@apache.org> wrote: > On 11/15/2011 01:43 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: >> +1 to Steve's proposal. Renaming 0.20 is too big a pain at this point. > > Everyone seems to agree that we should rename 0.23 to either 2.0 or 3.0. > There are a number of different views about what to do with 0.20, 0.21 > and 0.22. So maybe we should proceed where there's consensus and not > argue extensively where there's disagreement? > > Since 0.23 has little install base yet it should be easy to rename. If > we're not going to rename 0.20, 0.21 or 0.22 releases then 3.0 seems > inappropriate. > > Can we agree to 0.23 -> 2.0? That's consistent with the MR2 nomenclature. > > Doug >
