On Mar 19, 2012, at 5:23 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Arun C Murthy <a...@hortonworks.com> wrote: >> We've discussed several options: >> >> (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3. >> (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole. >> (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is. >> (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 >> months then we get option 1, else we get option 2. Effectively postpone >> discussion by 2 months, start a timer now. >> (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is. >> >> Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus. >> >> Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences. > > Not sure whether this vote is open to all community members, committers or PMC > (Arun, could you, please, clarify?) but here's my vote:
As always, everyone is welcome to vote. PMC votes are binding. Forgot to add, the vote will run the normal 7 days. Thanks for voting Roman. Arun
