On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, Sander Striker wrote:
> > From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 5:11 AM > > > My understanding from discussion with Sam and Ken was that creation of a new > > TLP or migrating to an existing one would be an exit, not entry, issue. > > That's correct. However, it wouldn't make much sense to let a project enter > when there is no notion of where it would exit too. There are options of where it would exit, but none are likely to be accepted without a successful incubation. A new TLP is unlikely to happen until the incubation is proven to succeed. The biggest issue is that there's not a proven exit strategy of an incubation project to a TLP. Is it possible to decide this? Jakarta and DB would be other possible exit strategies. I'm +1 on Directory being in Jakarta if it is not possible for a TLP to be an exit strategy, and then reassessing its TLP-ness later. So my view is: 1 Directory as a TLP for exit strategy. Is this possible? When could the board /Incubator PMC decide on this? 2 Failing that, Directory as a Jakarta project for an exit strategy, with the actual exit strategy to be re-evaluated at exit-time. If 1 is unable to happen, I can go look to get support on the Jakarta PMC list. Hen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
