On Tue, 2004-01-13 at 04:10, Tetsuya Kitahata wrote: > Hello folks, > > > This is what i have been thinking about. For long. > > "Committership in specified duration". > > For example, "Log4XXX" (New Project) needs some > committers in order to improve the quality of the > codebases rapidly and reliably, it seems. > (Patching, patching ... would dampen developers/contributors > spirits, especially in early stages) > > In such a case, how about allowing people to ask "Mr. XYZ > -- Committership privilege for *three* months only"...
Infrastructure overhead... > Clear declaration of the *termination* period would bring > nice results in the incubation process (going out), codebase, etc. How so? > If incubation might succeed, Mr.XYZ would be able to obtain > "formal" committership lawfully. :) ... Even though fail, ZOMBIE > committers (and zombie projects?) would never be increased. :) If a project fails incubation, committers that aren't on any other ASF projects loose their accounts (after a grace period) IMO. > I am sure that this can solve most of the problems in > incubator project... :) If you would be so kind to identify the actual problems first. Sander --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
