Two (maybe dumb) questions (1) Where can I get the (tentative) JCR API? (2) When *presumably* will Jackrabbit be mature enought to be an alternative to the current Slide backend?
Oliver On Sun, 31 Oct 2004 17:41:49 -0800, Roy T. Fielding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There is no problem. There is no reason at all for any one project > to "own" the CMS space at Apache. It makes sense for Slide to replace > its back-end with Jackrabbit for one and only one reason: such an > architecture will enable substitutability of its back-end and simplify > Slide's implementation. If that does not turn out to be the case, > then none of us would want Slide to use Jackrabbit and I see no > reason to badger them into doing so. Likewise for Lenya, JCMS, > and whatever else may come next. > > What we would like to see is all of the folks who think they might > need a JVM storage management interface to get involved in the > Jackrabbit project, try to use it to build useful things, tell us > all when problems are encountered (preferably right now, while the > JCR specification is still easy to change), and through that > interaction make Jackrabbit something more useful than just another > JSR interface. That is a heck of a lot more useful than just waiting > to see what code the current project developers turn out. > > ....Roy > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
