[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:On 8 Nov 2004, at 18:53, Jeremy Boynes wrote:I think we may be in violent agreement here :-)
I think we should add some type of collective entity, I just hesitate to call it a Group as that tends to be associated with a specific model ( a relatively static set of users and other groups). Call it Assignee or something and allow for more dynamic models :-)Cool; I'll submit a patch. Assignee sounds a bit vague; how about Workgroup, Role or Team?
That kind of leaves out the poor old individual user but I agree Assignee is a weak name - better than "ThingToAssignTheTaskTo" I guess although that could be refactored later :-)
:)
Given those, Role would be my choice although that tends to get overloaded as well. I have seen "Role" used by a few different business communities so it may fit their world view well.
Agreed.
How about adding another word to make it more specific - WorkflowRole, WorkGroup or ActivityGroup or something?
James ------- http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
