Ah, I see, thanks for explaining to me :) Oliver
On Tue, 7 Dec 2004 14:01:09 -0500, Brian McCallister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > OJB supports a JDO interface via a plugin to the JDO 1.0.X reference > implementation (which is SCSL, non-commercial variant) so is basically > useless right now. This same RI is part of the initial codebase for > this project, so the OJB JDO 1.0.X interface can actually become useful > =) > > -Brian > > > > On Dec 7, 2004, at 12:01 PM, Oliver Zeigermann wrote: > > > Doesn't ORB already support JDO? > > > > Oliver > > > > > > On Tue, 07 Dec 2004 08:47:19 -0800, Craig Russell > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> The DB project voted to adopt JDO last week-end, and they suggested I > >> contact you to set up the resources for the project. > >> > >> I've attached the proposal. Perhaps you can suggest the next step for > >> me to pursue? > >> > >> Thanks, > >> > >> Craig > >> > >> -- > >> > >> > >> Craig Russell > >> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo > >> 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! > >> > >> > >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
