El sáb, 17-09-2005 a las 10:16 +0200, Bertrand Delacretaz escribió: > Le 17 sept. 05, à 01:19, Thorsten Scherler a écrit : > > ...I am actually unsure whether or not a committer role makes sense > > because > > e.g. the cocoon based projects have given the commit right to each > > other. That means per definition of the role (that we have now) that > > new > > committer entering e.g. forrest will be as well committer to cocoon > > without even to have to submit a single line of code.... > > Note that over at Cocoon we make an important distinction between > > a) having commit rights to the code repository > and > b) being a committer, in the sense of having a demonstrated committment > to the project, voting rights, etc.
That is the point. The definition on apache.org do not have this distinction! You are a committer if you have a). In forrest and lenya we see it like cocoon, but how can you explain that to new committer that read http://apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html#roles ¿? salu2 -- thorsten "Together we stand, divided we fall!" Hey you (Pink Floyd) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
