On Fri, Dec 30, 2005 at 10:21:59AM -0500, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
> Agreed, but the Tuscany proposal was an independent proposal, not
> sponsored (at the time) by any PMC.
Dims mentioned that they had planned to approve that proposal through the
WS PMC - so if it had been sponsored by them, there would have been no
change permitted by the Incubator PMC to address concerns like Roy's.
> >The Incubator PMC
> >should also be able to make a judgment ("certification"?) of the
> >process proposed by the PMC - such as whether a code base should be
> >under full incubation or just use the IP clearance form.
> >
> >I think that making it clear that the Incubator PMC can do this would
> >go a long way to addressing some of the concerns already mentioned.
>
> Agreed - although in general, if a PMC just ignored the input of the
> Incubator PMC on a PMCs suggested incubation, it's an indication of a
> problem anyway...
As Greg said, that's for the board to deal with. -- justin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
