Alan D. Cabrera wrote: > On 2/23/2006 9:16 AM, Upayavira wrote: > >> Niclas Hedhman wrote: >> >> >>> On Thursday 23 February 2006 15:46, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote: >>> >>>> Why not just modify incubator procedure to make it clear that >>>> >>>> 1) Mentors make the requests and >>>> >>>> 2) They sign the email w/ the title "$PODLING_NAME Mentor" >>>> >>>> Now #2 don't prevent someone from misrepresenting themselves - which >>>> would have to be dealt with - but rather it allows us to not act on but >>>> simply reply back to those that ask for accounts w/o representing >>>> themselves as mentors... >>>> >>> Infra doesn't want emails with requests. They want JIRA issues for >>> better tracking of progress et al. >>> >>> Make a list what the issue must contain, for instance; >>> >>> * Proper title according to some template. >>> * URL to VOTE SUMMARY, >>> * Name of Mentor >>> * Incubator General and/or PMC mailing list as a subscriber, so that >>> someone >>> can step in and hit the breaks if it wrong. >>> * List of Resources. >>> >>> and whatever else the Infra people like to see... >>> >>> Then keep a template somewhere, which the Mentor copy/paste into the >>> Jira issue, fills in and off we go :o) >>> >> >> No. Account requests should go by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] That's their >> preferred >> route. Jira requests will likely be ignored. >> >> > > This strikes me as odd. Jira can be setup so that only authorized > people can post requests. We can also create issue types that have the > required data that needs to be suppiled. It also allows us to track the > outstanding requests.
I'm only repeating what has been said before. Not being root, I don't know the exact justifications, other than perhaps a general loathing of Jira. Upayavira --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
