Hello, I wanted to let everyone know that we have scheduled a CeltiXfire Proposal BOF at ApacheCon Dublin for this Thursday at 9 pm in the Munster Room at the Burlington Hotel. For anyone who is interested, please join us to meet some of the committers on the proposal and to learn more about the proposed project. We'll stay as late as needed to answer any questions.
Debbie -----Original Message----- From: Adinarayana Sakala [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 26, 2006 5:54 PM To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] CeltiXfire Project Hi Sanjiva, > Adi, can you confirm that from IONA's perspective the project is a > JAX-WS implementation along with additional stuff for security, RM etc.? CeltiXfire is aimed at developing various SOA infrastructure components, including JAX-WS, WS-* stuff but not limited just to them, as I hope was made clear in the proposal. CeltiXfire community also aims at providing support for multi-transport and multi-dataformat capabilities along with extensibility for legacy integration. From WS-* perspective yes in some ways CeltiXfire could be seen as an alternative but in other ways it could be seen as complementary, since Axiom (which is part of Axis2) could be used as one of the multiple data models, WSS4J could be used as delivering support for WS-Security etc. Regards, Adi Sakala On 6/24/06, Sanjiva Weerawarana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 2006-06-24 at 13:28 -0400, Dan Diephouse wrote: > > Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote: > > > I thought XFire does all these specs too > > > (http://xfire.codehaus.org/Stack+Comparison; except for obviously > > > JAX-WSA as that's not even done yet). So what part of Celtix (other than > > > the name) is in Celtixfire in that case? > > > > > > > > Celtix has JAX-WS nearly fully done (hard to tell when the TCK isn't > > available yet), where as XFire only has about 50% done. Additionally > > Celtix has things like WS-RM, better JMX Integration, a better JMS > > transport, etc. > > OK; I knew that about Celtix anyway .. my real question was for Celtix! > > > I don't presume to speak for IONA, but after chatting with them a fair > > amount I wouldn't let their marketing team influence your opinion of > > what the project is about. > > Adi, can you confirm that from IONA's perspective the project is a > JAX-WS implementation along with additional stuff for security, RM etc.? > In other words, its an alternate WS-* stack to the stuff that's under > development in the WS project (except for the JCP spec implementation > focus, which the WS project doesn't have). > > Sanjiva. > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Adi Sakala http://celtix.objectweb.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
