Ian Holsman wrote:
> isn't Active MQ an alternative to Blaze/AMQP ?
> If this project was accepted would Apache have *2* different
> messaging servers?
Ant and Maven? Axis2 and XFire? GUMP and Maven Continuum?
> which use different protocols ?
Blaze is about only AMQP, a proposed standard for interoperable messaging.
ActiveMQ implements multiple protocols. There is some disagreement between
AMQP proponents and the ActiveMQ team regarding the desirability of
balkanizing messaging protocols.
> if blaze's goal is to create a standardized widely available and
> interoperable messaging solution (you forgot enterprise class)
> why is it creating a new one, and not using JMS ?
Blaze's goal (AMQP) is to provide multple language implementations of a
language-neutral, wire-level, protocol with a ton of detailed semantics for
interoperable messaging. JMS is a a Java API.
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
