+1 (non-binding) All the packaging etc of this release looks ok to me (though I still can't get the web service sample to work, I'll raise a JIRA about that).
This vote has been going a week now, could any more of you with binding votes spare a bit of time to review and vote on the release? ...ant On 7/25/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/21/06, Pete Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > We have held a vote on tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org to publish a release of > the Tuscany C++ implementation. The vote email thread is available here: > http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev%40ws.apache.org/msg05134.html > <http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev%40ws.apache.org/msg05134.html+> > > In summary we have 4 +1 votes from committers and no 0s or -1s. i've never cut C++ releases - and having read about your battles, i'm now glad about that. hopefully some release managers more expert in C++ will jump and take a look... once you've smoothed out the process, it'd be great if you could contribute some patches to the incubator release guide covering C++ specific release issues and tips. We would like to request approval from the Incubator PMC to release this > version. > > The candidate distribution is available here: > http://people.apache.org/~robbinspg/RC-3b/ +1 there are a small number of documents that would probably be better with license headers and several blank documents (which i suspect were generated by autoconf) but otherwise no nits i can find. - robert
