Idiotic question from complete Apache newbie: is the proposal that Apache should start hosting specs but would still host projects implementing foreign specs, or that Apache should stop hosting projects implementing non-Apache specs?
On Mon, 2006-08-14 at 08:34 +0100, James Strachan wrote: > On 8/13/06, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Carl Trieloff wrote: > > > > > -> Is Apache in the business of writing and publishing specifications? <- > > > > > As long as Apache is not in the business of also creating > > > specifications, there will be by definition some separation > > > between code and spec processes, and I would like to work > > > with the ASF to try improve this. > > > > Wait ... why can't a specification be a releasable, just like a codebase? > > The only issue, as I see it, would be enforcement of compliance. And Roy > > even put forward a proposed license amendment for such things. > > > > As you saying that if the ASF would host the specification, that you and > > the rest of the AMQP IP holders would be willing to contribute and manage > > the specification here under ASF practices? > > > > I would be in favor of such an approach. Honestly, I would vastly prefer > > to have Open Specifications managed under ASF processes than under the JCP, > > OASIS, etc. > > +1 > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
