On 8/28/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
robert burrell donkin wrote:
> On 8/11/06, Steve Toback <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The Lokahi community voted on and has approved a proposal to release
>> Lokahi M01. Pursuant to the Releases section of the Incubation Policy
>> we would now like to request the permission of the Incubator PMC to
>> publish the tarball on the Lokahi Download page.
>
> there are some files which IMO could and should have license headers but
> do not:
>
> * most of the files in conf
> * most of the files in database
> * docs/setup.html
Robert, was this an objection to the M01 tarball, or something to address
before M02?
i'm not -1 on M01 but IMHO the license header issue should be
addressed before the release
there are some issues around license headers and sometimes a project
needs to take a view about how they want to apply policy. for example,
see
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/200607.mbox/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
(at the bottom)
- robert
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
