Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: > i do not believe that having made a release should be a requirement.
I agree. And it would be somewhat ironic to make that a requirement, although I do understand the reasons behind the assertions made by those who are concerned. Looking at Felix, I see Alex, Upayavira and several others who had better already understand that quite clearly, so if they are active members of the new project, I would expect them to continue their oversight. Consider that over the past few years, we have changed licensing, copyright notice, and other requirements at least twice. Existing projects need to change, not just those in the Incubator. All Release Managers have to keep abreast of current ASF policy, and PMCs have to ensure that they implement it properly, and check with the Board and/or VP Legal if there are questions. APR and JAMES have both gone through this process with Cliff, as have others. So I generally favor Felix's request to graduate, although since so many others want to see it demonstrate a proper release package, I'm willing to support that request. What I don't see in the request is the proposed TLP request, and I do believe that the Incubator should have that, and not just have it pop up to the Board after we have voted. So in my view, that ought to be a requirement for a project wanting to graduate as a TLP. --- Noel --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]