Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
> Should this really be "Shall"? We've been successful in Harmony with a
> slightly different model, where we didn't just sweep committers in
> except for the mentors and champion, because we didnt' start with any
code.
Yes, it should be a Shall, since it has been made quite clear that the
majority of people want a binding list. The work you did on Harmony:
> We treated the Initial Committer list as an indication of interest, and
> just looked for people that followed through once the project got started.
would have to be done PRIOR to the vote.
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
