Marshall Schor wrote:
The most popular way to pronounce UIMA is you-eee-muh.
There is a fairly large user community using pre-Apache UIMA. The
potential confusion about which UIMA people may be talking about may be
mitigated somewhat by versioning. The pre-Apache releases are numbered
1.x.x; the Apache ones will be numbered as 2.x.x and higher. (We are
showing a "beta" level of 2.x in pre-Apache form, but will transition
users as rapidly as possible to the the Apache one, once we get set up
and "going" in Apache).
If we rename it, this might cause some confusion itself - it would
appear that there were 2 different things, rather than one thing that
was moving from its previous environment to Apache. I'm not sure what
would be more confusing - having a new name, or having users understand
that the project has moved to Apache.
I don't understand the problem here. Is UIMA going to be something
different when it moves to apache? and why should users care where the
project is hosted?
If you ask me - Just keep the name.
--
Sami Siren
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
