+1 from me. -- dims
On 11/10/06, J Aaron Farr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 11/6/06, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I understand it is good practice to restart a vote if the vote thread > becomes heavy with discussion. This is the case with the vote that was > begun at > http://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg11201.html > which contains some issues raised and comments to address each of those > issues. > > So please vote to ratify the Tuscany PPMC vote to release SDO for Java M2 > artifacts at http://people.apache.org/~kelvingoodson/sdo_java/RC5a/ which > have been voted for by the Tuscany PPMC. +1 Though I agree with the earlier sentiment expressed by Bill Dudney [1] that the LICENSE and/or NOTICE file should explicitly state which jars are under which licenses. This is at least not the case for the RC5a binary. Otherwise, good job! -- jaaron [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg11273.html --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Davanum Srinivas : http://www.wso2.net (Oxygen for Web Service Developers) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
